Yearly Archives: 2012

One year on: 3/11

I really I wish I had just 1 Yen for every column inch that has been written or is going to be written about the ‘mega-disaster’ that hit Japan a year ago today.
If I had another Yen for every self-serving ounce of hyperbole ……well let’s just say I wouldn’t be eating radioactive vegetables for dinner tonight.

The farce that has unfolded in Japanese politics and society since that horrible day that took so many lives in its wall of water and the irresponsible, downright criminal lies and incompetency that surrounds the handling of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear “incident” over the past year are so unbelievable that to begin to enumerate them seems an impossible task.

A year later the devastation to Tohoku and the continuing international fear over the global effects of the ‘World’s worst industrial disaster’ (as if not calling it a  nuclear disaster somehow lessens its impact) ensure that “Fukushima” will go down in history in whispered tones reserved only for that other expletive “Chernobyl”

And yet, what has really changed here in Tokyo?
The half-hearted so-called ‘sakura revolution’ which produced some of the biggest demonstrations Japan has seen since its Police beat the student protestors to a pulp in the 1960’s was neutered from the start by a culture that allowed the same Police, with their cuddly orange cartoon logo and condemned by Amnesty international detention practices, to break even 50 or 60,000 strong marches up into nice comfortable little pockets that wouldn’t affect the shopping habits of the 99.999% of Tokyo’s 13 million residents who were carrying on as usual.
The milk, vegetables and rice that were suddenly incredibly cheap and well within (swiftly recalibrated) radiation limits sat unpurchased except by the most hardcore of the 我々日本人 (we Japanese) brigade for a few short months only to fly off shelves once the latest bordering on child pornography AKB48 single had distracted the national attention away from the potentially generations long threat that was silently permeating every nook and cranny of their existence.
The loud, guilt inducing calls for energy-saving in the wake of almost all of Japan’s nuclear reactors being shut down have faded away to be replaced by the same 30ft video screens advertising the latest J-pop schmultz everywhere you turn and the huge department stores with their air conditioners running full blast but doors wide open just as they were before March last year.
The brief flirtation even ordinary Tokyoites had with not trusting every word that comes from the mouths of their politicians or TV news presenters has been forgotten too. In this week leading up to the anniversary, International media has been doing a passable if slightly sycophantic job of trying to unravel what exactly the effects have been on Japan whilst the biggest story in the Japanese media has been of escaped penguins.

The people of the Tohoku coast will be dealing with the devastation and after effects for generations to come.
The 20km exclusion zone around the Fukushima Daiichi reactor complex will probably never be safely inhabitable again.
Children from areas nearby will tragically grow up with a far greater chance of developing various cancers and will no doubt be stigmatised in the same way the victims of the Minamata disaster were before them.
The reconstruction of the area by the incredibly selfless work of the numerous volunteer groups that have sprung up will take decades.
No one in those areas worst affected will be forgetting the disaster and the criminal incompetency of the authorities in the wake of it for a long time.

Yet here in Tokyo, the Japanese people had a brief window and more than 600 greater than M5 reminder aftershocks to shake themselves out of their comas and genuinely change aspects of their culture and society that desperately need to be jettisoned like the rotten old dead wood that they are. A chance to ensure that the institutionalised failures and lies that have allowed TEPCO and the government to pull the wool quietly but successfully back over the eyes of all but the most militant, and therefore destined never to be listened to members of the society, would never be allowed to happen again.

It was unfortunately a chance that they didn’t take, in Tokyo at least the 250km to Fukushima seems to be an awful lot further than it was a year ago when we were glued to our television screens trying our best to believe that the plumes of smoke billowing from the stricken reactors were as safe as the announcers were telling us they were.
That added sense of distance means once again that what is out of sight stays firmly and dogmatically out of mind.

I Love You But…..

Allow me to present a short music video for your delectation.

“I Love You But…” is a song I wrote and recorded more than 10 years ago and it is one of the pieces I still love most from my time as a musician.
I’ve recently been frustrated by a couple of stalled documentary projects and needed to do or learn something new before I went crazy, so I’ve been studying 3D modelling software and After Effects.
Anyway, the video above is the result of my meddling.

Who is the song about? Now, that would be telling………..

Do you get paid for your job?

For my inaugural post of 2012 I have a happy story.
A little out of character I know, but this one is good and is all about why you should stand up for yourself and your work.

****PLEASE NOTE – All the name’s have been changed to protect the innocent and I am writing this with consent of the person whose emails I will quote****

Most of us have received one of those “can we use your picture for free?” emails, and frankly recently they seem to be on the increase, to the point where I have started to get a little rude.
Below is an email I received from a well-known newspaper about a week ago:-

Hi Adrian

 I’m putting together an online XXXXXX  for (Name of newspaper) in the UK, and was pointed in your direction by XXXXXXX.  We’re doing a piece on the best photoblogs in the city, and would like to include you!
 
We’ve picked five bloggers/photographers, and are asking each person to pick their two favourite images of the city, with a sentence on why they’ve picked that image. I know your images can be quite dark, but we’re looking for stuff that shows the wonderful side of Tokyo, even if it’s wonderful in a weird/twisted kind of way!
 
I’m afraid we don’t have a budget for this, but will make sure that the image and caption credits links directly to your site (or whatever page you wanted).
 
How does that sound? Ideally, we’d need your choices by the end of this week.
 
Looking forward to hearing from you,
 
Thanks!
XXXXXX
 
 
It was to be honest a bit of a dilemma as I didn’t want to say No, but I am not prepared to give my work away for free, after consultation with some friends and a bit of thought I eventually replied thusly:-
 
 
Hi XXXXXX,
Thanks for your mail, which I’m just getting to now because of the time difference.I appreciate your interest in my work and interest in including me in the piece but it has left me with a bit of a dilemma.I am not really a blogger, I am a freelance professional photographer and film maker. This is my job. This is how I put food on my table.

Usually when I receive requests to use my photographs for free I reply like this:-

“Dear Sir/Madam,
In response to your email I would like to ask you a question, Do you get paid for your job?

I thought so, then please don’t insult me by asking me to do mine for free.

Yours sincerely
etc”

And yes, I usually send it out word for word.

You would be surprised how many organisations suddenly find they do have a budget for photography after receiving that mail.
Of course many don’t, but one is tempted to think that the ones who never reply were not worth the effort anyway.

So here is my dilemma.
I love (Name of newspaper), a long time ago in a country far far away I used to buy a physical print copy (oh how quaint;-) at least 3 times a week.
I read regularly online and know several people who work there.
I would love to see my work in (Name of Newspaper) , or at least on the website.

I don’t really want to send you the “do you do your job for free?” mail, but I also think it is very important that photographers stand up for themselves and their work when requests like this come in.

As far as I can see there are 3 solutions to this problem:-

1) (Name of Newspaper) suddenly finds that they do have a budget for photography for this piece, even if it was a small token budget of say XX quid a picture that may very well be enough.

2) You, despite getting paid for your job, write back saying “sorry, really don’t have any money” or more likely don’t respond to this at all and choose someone else.

3) We reach a compromise as people. You are asking me for my work for free, so I ask you for something. Not you “web producer at (Name of newspaper)” but you personally “XXXXXX”.
I say that if you reach into your own pocket and donate say £XX to the Japanese Red Cross for disaster relief in Tohoku northern Japan, then I will send you 2 pictures and agree to them being used in (Name of newspaper) on a onetime limited use licence for free.

I look forward to hearing from you and I will prepare the pictures ready for sending in the hope that options 1 or 3 are your choice.

Yours Sincerely

Adrian Storey

I was quietly proud of myself for this response and to be honest was just expecting option 2 (“sorry, still no money f&*k you”) as the reply.
I couldn’t have been more wrong.
 
About 2 days later I was having a drink with some friends when 2 emails arrived almost simultaneously, the first informing that a donation had been made in my name to a Tsunami relief fund and the second:-
 

Adrian

You are unquestionably right, and I’m sorry for creating this dilemma.
 
A have donated to a Japan Tsunami relief charity – you should receive an email from them soon, as it was made “in your honour”.
 
I’m also going to offer a £XX commission to you and all the other bloggers who take part. I know this is not much, but it’s already further than we should be stretching  – but if this is not enough to justify you allowing us to use the images, I fully understand.
 
Once again, sorry. And thanks. 
 
XXXXX
 
Now I say, respect where respect is due.
I really wish I could name this guy because I feel he deserves some recognition for being such a star.
A donation and paying me and the other contributors from a starting point of “it’ll be good publicity, but sorry no money”?
Legend.
Total.Fucking.Legend.
If I’m back in the UK I so owe this guy a beer.
Thanks for being such a professional and a damn good guy brother (if you are reading this you know who you are ;-)
 
The moral of this story?
DO NOT GIVE YOUR WORK AWAY FOR FREE!!!!
Sometimes all it takes is to calmly state why you feel you should be paid and the person requesting your images will do the right thing.
 
If a few more people did this perhaps our industry wouldn’t be being eroded away by amateurs who buy a “nice” camera , think that makes them a photographer and are happy to give their low quality work away for the ‘publicity’.
 
I hope this is a taste of things to come this year, keep those requests coming and keep paying me when I ask.